Participants distributed a press release stating that the students were enraged by the administration's actions and that the "trustees [had] not made an adequate effort on this issue and [had] not fairly weighed the information that they [had] received." Students hoped that their actions would demonstrate support for the fraternity-based social system at Amherst.
The sit-in was peaceful and inoffensive, according to The Student. The passive action did not break College rules, disrupt classes, harm or threaten other people or disrupt the normal operation of the College. Instead, students wrote letters to the trustees, played trivia games and Monopoly and studied to pass the time. Students simply wanted to "make a final stand" against what they felt was a savage and unfair attack on the College's fraternities.
Other pro-fraternity protests included a hunger strike led by a group of 12 individuals that was to begin the following day, according to student sources cited in The Student. The protesters planned to drink only diluted fruit juices until a final decision was made Saturday. For many, the sit-in was motivated by concerns that student opinions on the issue had not been given sufficient weight. Others simply considered it to be "a last-ditch effort."
Chi Psi member Sarah Stauderman told The Student, "This will let them know the students' concern about the issue. They can't ignore us."
-Lauren Schmale