While the fasters' aim was to remain on hunger strike for the full week, most planned to start eating after two or three days. Roy Chaleff '68, one of the organizers of the fast, estimated that only six to 10 people would fast for the full eight days. Originally, the fasters had discussed drinking orange juice, but this elicited comments from the student body calling the protest a "half-fast." Instead, the students on the fast would wear black arm bands and sustain themselves with a diet of water and vitamin pills.
Sympathy among students for the protestors remained mixed. Many, while agreeing with the cause, disagreed with Chaleff's assertion that a hunger strike would have more of an impact on people than another form of demonstration. Chaleff claimed that fasting would disprove the stereotype of protestors as "effeminate intellectuals." A student identified by The Student simply as "a sophomore cutie" responded, "I don't see anything more masculine about fasting than about picketing."
Faculty sympathies were also conflicted, although supporters of the fast were more vocal in their protests. A statement issued by the faculty summing up objection to the chemical destruction of Vietcong rice paddies by U.S. Air Force napalm bombing said that this action "would seem to violate all the requirements for 'just war' developed by morally concerned men over the centuries. Such destruction cannot discriminate between combatants and women and children."