Though the committee of outside experts was a promising development in the creation of an LJST department, the program's merit would still be subject to review by the Committee on Educational Policy (CEP) and would still be put to a faculty vote, which was to be held in November. The faculty vote would determine the future of the LJST program. It would either become a major, be abolished altogether or remain as it was.
Some students felt that with between a quarter and a third of College students attending law school after graduation, it was inadvisable for them to participate in the LJST program since they wouldn't be able to explore other academic fields. Most students, however, were eager for the LJST program to become a department and a major. Another concern that would need to be addressed was the allocation of faculty. At the time, two faculty positions were held by visiting professors Lawrence Douglas and Victoria Saker, and it was not yet certain if those positions would become permanent, therefore requiring permanent faculty members. There were also concerns as to what Professor of Philosophy Thomas Kearns and Professor of Political Science Austin Sarat would do if LJST was departmentalized. Both assured The Student that they would not leave their respective departments. "It's absolutely a non-issue," explained Sarat.