When CNN Fails, We look to Jon Our Steward
By Alexander Hurst '12
Two weeks ago, Fox News (or Faux News as I like to call it) showed video clips of a “teabagger” anti-health care reform protest outside the Capitol in Washington, D.C. The anchors remarked happily about the great number of people in attendance. Any casual viewer would not have given the coverage so much as a second thought; thankfully, a sharp, trusted news source caught the problem with Fox’s coverage.

The first clip to air showed a protest on a clear-skied day, autumn in full swing. The second clip, rolled as if it were a continuation of the first from a different pan and angle, showed a large group of people carrying signs on a grey, cloudy, summer day with trees in full green foliage. These clips were of two different protests, the trusted news anchor pointed out — the first of the anti-health care reform rally and the second of Glenn Beck’s 9/12 rally that had taken place months earlier.

So whose careful eye caught the “mistake” (and I use that term loosely)? I’ll give you a hint: it wasn’t CNN or even MSNBC. It was a source that Americans have come to trust just as much, if not more, than Brian Williams, Katie Couric, Anderson Cooper, Charlie Gibson and their respective networks. In Jon they trust, and rightly so. It was Jon Stewart, the man whose show kept me sane during the Bush administration and who keeps me hopeful today.

There are two stories here. The first is that Fox distorts, manipulates and sometimes tells plain old lies in their “news” coverage. The second is that in a nation that champions a free press, it is a fake news comedy show that often displays more integrity, grit and willingness to pursue the truth and hold public figures accountable for their words than the mainstream media.

It was Stewart, after all, who succinctly broke down the Fox strategy with helpful video clips: the opinion wing — that’s Glenn Beck, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity —makes outrageous claims and accusations, founded neither in reality nor fact, and then the following day, Fox News reports on these rumors and conspiracies as, “Some say…” but never mentioning that those who “say” are Fox personalities who said it the previous night during their Fox shows.

But beyond the humorous, if not sad, moments of catching Faux News with its pants around its ankles, Stewart and his “Daily Show” have become indispensible not for sophomoric humor, but for what has become a fight for political and media accountability and rationality.

As is becoming more and more the case, while the mainstream media jockey for ratings with up to the minute coverage of balloon boy type incidents, Stewart remains the stalwart inquisitor who not only holds people to their words, but holds them to reason as well. Where the rest of the news media decide what to report (barely) and let the viewers decide, a fake news comedy show has the courage to state that while there may be two sides to every story, sometimes one side is true and one side is not, that sometimes one side makes sense, and the other is insane.

Some of Stewart’s best moments come from his stinging social critique and stern, but fair, questioning of guests that far outpaces the lackadaisical loquacity they are often allowed on CNN, a network more apt to fact check “Saturday Night Live” than a U.S. Senator — anyone who has seen Stewart’s “leave it there” montage will know exactly what I mean. But more often, his best moments come from the hypocrisy and inconsistency of his “victims” themselves. Woe to you if you are the subject of a “Daily Show” video montage, because like Joe Lieberman, you will rue that footage from 2006 when you supported universal healthcare that runs side-by-side with current footage of you opposing it.

Though he spares no ridicule for those who provoke it, for the most part, Stewart is congenial with his guests — he has to keep them coming back, after all. However, being congenial does not mean he throws them softballs. I said he is stern but fair, and that is exactly what he has been to the likes of Bill Kristol, whom he trapped into admitting that the government can in fact provide the highest quality health care (to members of the military). Kristol tried to work his way out of this corner by saying that while yes the government did a good job, it was far too expensive and undeserved to be lavished on ordinary Americans in the same way. Tried. It didn’t go over too well with the audience.

“Hey man, did you see ‘The Daily Show’ last night?” has perhaps become the most common refrain among liberals. Personally, I think he has the best job in the world, one that I wish I had but am glad that he is doing. There is an unspoken recognition that Jon has got our backs, that when we want to tear our hair out (as I do now that Obama decided to send 30,000 troops to Afghanistan), all we have to do is wait until 10 p.m. Politicians will keep making fools of themselves and a mess of the country, and “The Daily Show” will keep turning our despair into wary laughter.

As much by his own effectiveness as by news media incompetency, Stewart has made “The Daily Show” a significant force in American political culture. Over the summer, The Huffington Post joked that a government release of torture documents had been timed to coincide with a “Daily Show” hiatus, noting that Sarah Palin had resigned on the first day of a “Daily Show” vacation as well.

It was a joke, but in many ways, it makes sense. If I were a politician or the government releasing potentially embarrassing information, I would be sure to avoid wrath and ridicule from Stewart and his correspondents.

Issue 10, Submitted 2009-12-02 02:24:54